Coen Bros: A Serious Man part 5

Larry is back at work.  He’s got a message from Sy Abelman, the man whom his wife is leaving him for: "Let’s have a nice talk."  Clive, his student who wants a new mid-term grade, has come in again.  Larry holds up the envelope full of cash and indirectly accuses Clive of bribing him.  Clive remains opaque, while at the same time seeming to know what’s in the envelope.  "Actions have consequences," says Larry, but Clive isn’t entirely with him. "Yes, often" is the best he can do.  This sends Larry into a frenzy: all actions, he says, have consequences — not just in physics, but morally.  This is an important insight into Larry’s mind: to him, life makes sense only when actions have consequences.  Things don’t just "happen" for no reason, an envelope full of money doesn’t just appear on his desk for no reason.  Clive either did, or did not, try to bribe Larry.  Based on the evidence, it seems clear that he did, but there’s nothing Larry can do to prove it, and Clive doesn’t give him an inch.  As I’ve mentioned before, Larry is being tested here.  If Clive did not leave the money on Larry’s desk, who did?  Did Hashem?  An envelope full of money seems well within the realm of the possible, given some of the events that eventually transpire in this movie.  The notion that actions always have consequences will have a special resonance in the closing moments of the movie, especially regarding this envelope of money.

See the movie first!

Coen Bros: A Serious Man part 4

We’ve met Larry Gopnik and his son Danny and are acquainted with their problems.  What’s the story at Larry’s house?

See the movie first!

Coen Bros: A Serious Man part 3

Enter Clive.

Clive is a student in Larry Gopnik’s physics class.  Clive has failed a recent test.  He wants Larry to raise his grade so that he can pass the class, otherwise he will lose his scholarship.  At first blush, it seems that Clive’s suit is without merit — he failed the test, he deserves what he gets.

See the movie first!

Coen Bros: A Serious Man part 2

After the Eastern-European parable that precedes the titles, A Serious Man shifts it focus to Danny Gopnik.  The Coens literally put us inside Danny’s head, tunneling outward toward the tiny speaker stuck in his ear.

See the movie first!

Coen Bros: A Serious Man part 1

 

I’ve received many comments from people who didn’t like the Coen Bros’ A Serious Man because it has “a passive protagonist.”

Well, interesting that folks should bring that up.  A Serious Man challenges the protagonist question in a way I’ve never seen a movie do before, and it’s not just idle observation, it’s built into the structure of the entire movie.  Because A Serious Man does not have a passive protagonist, it has a very active protagonist.  A very active — and very powerful — protagonist.

Unless, of course, it does not.  Which is exactly where the mystery lies.

Let me explain.

See the movie first!

Nota bene

If you have not done so already, for heaven’s sake go see the new Coen Bros movie as soon as time allows.  My time is short at the moment for discussion, and I don’t want to spoil any of this altogether astonishing movie, which I believe is the Coens best, which is saying a lot.  In a time when American film seems to be getting worse and worse, the Coens keep getting better and better.  This is their most fully realized, most deeply felt, most openly profound, most deeply mysterious movie.

Analysis of this complex screenplay will have to wait for the DVD release, but I welcome readers to discuss the movie under the fold.  There will be, no doubt, spoilers within, so those who haven’t seen it should probably not venture beyond the link.free stats

Movie Night with Urbaniak: The Miracle of Morgan’s Creek

free stats

urbaniak and I have an ongoing game, where we try to draw parallels between actors of one generation and another. Certain "types" are always needed for one kind of narrative or another, and so it stands to reason that Cary Grant gets re-born as George Clooney, Robert Redford gets re-born as Brad Pitt, Steve McQueen gets re-born as Daniel Craig, and so forth.

The sad thing is that some actors are never re-born. I’ve searched for decades and not found a replacement for Myrna Loy, or Carole Lombard, or Gene Kelly.

Read more

Some thoughts on Burn After Reading

free stats

I know I’m really late to the party on this movie, but I finally got a chance to go see Burn After Reading the other day and since several of my readers have asked me to post my thoughts about it, I hereby oblige. Please read no further without seeing the movie first (something I highly recommend under any circumstances).

Read more

Yay Oscars!

I am, of course, mightily pleased that my favorite movie of 2007, No Country For Old Men, won the big awards last night. For those just joining the conversation, or those who are wondering why No Country was actually the year’s Best Picture, my thoughts on the movie can be found here: part 1, part 2, part 3 and part 4. If that is not enough Coen analysis for you, the whole kit and kaboodle of my thoughts on the Coens movies can be found here.

I know I’m getting old when the Oscars start making sense to me.


hit counter html code

Coen Bros: No Country For Old Men part 4

In which I chat about some of the things that occurred to me while watching the movie, in no particular order. Many spoilers within.

1. In the opening narration, Sheriff Bell talks about sending a boy to the electric chair. In the book, he sends him to the gas chamber. I assume the Coens made the change in order to link the criminal to Ed Crane and George Nelson, both of whom die in the electric chair in their movies (or perhaps to more accurately reflect the reality of Texas executions in 1980).

2. When Moss stumbles upon the suitcase full of money while trying to track down his wounded antelope, for some reason I was reminded of Jed Clampett. And it occurs to me that The Beverly Hillbillies would have been a better show if Jed was forced to flee his home to a number of dingy motels, outrunning ruthless killers every step of the way, in order to protect his family, before finally losing everything. Although obviously that would involve a title change. (It also occurs to me that There Will Be Blood, in its final 20 minutes, becomes a deadly serious take on The Beverly Hillbillies.)

3. I was impressed with Josh Brolin’s performance in No Country, as I’ve been impressed with his performances in Grindhouse and American Gangster this year as well. The kid’s come a long way since The Goonies.

4. The movie Carla Jean is watching when Moss comes in with the suitcase full of money is Flight to Tangier, a 1953 thriller about, yes, a bunch of people pursuing a large amount of missing cash. The movie was made in 3-D and three-strip Technicolor, but Carla Jean seems happy enough to watch it on her black-and-white TV — a comment on the diminished lives of the characters of No Country?

5. If I haven’t done so enough before, let me now again praise the Coens for the shooting style of No Country. For directors who know more about cool cinematic tricks than just about anyone else out there, the Coens pare back their vocabulary in No Country to the bare essentials, to match the spare, no-quotation-marks-please style of the novel. Most of No Country consists of uninflected shots of men performing simple tasks — picking up a shell casing, walking through the desert, sawing off a gun barrel, cutting the hook off a wire clothes hanger, driving a car, so forth. There is little narrative beyond the recording of physical activity (another thing No Country shares with There Will Be Blood). The Coens had faith that the story would contain enough novelty and suspense (I cannot see how it could contain more than it does) that they would not have to resort to flashy technique to “sell” it.

6. When Sheriff Bell goes to see his Uncle Ellis in order to get some perspective on this madness, Ellis reminds him that extreme, senseless violence has been with us since the country’s conception and counsels him against thinking he can stem the tide of blood. “You can’t stop what’s comin.’ It ain’t all waitin’ on you,” he says, “that’s vanity.” This line is not in the book, although it could have easily. And then I note that, in the very next scene, when Carla Jean comes into her bedroom to find Chigurh there, she says “I need to sit down.” In the book (and in the screenplay), she sits down on the bed, but in the movie she sits at, yes, the vanity.

7. Carla Jean, while fleeing her home with Moss, says “I’m used to lots of things — I work at Wal-Mart,” another reference to the “breakdown of mercantile ethics” that the movie sees as the central cause of the escalation of violence that informs its narrative.

8. For a movie about hunters and trackers all pursuing and eluding each other, its odd that no one in the movie seems concerned for a second about fingerprints. Moss leaves them all over the place at the crime scene (in the book he takes time to remove all his prints), and when Sheriff Bell sees that Chigurh has left a milk bottle sitting on Moss’s coffee table, he sees no reason not to pick it up and have a drink himself.

9. For a movie about a breakdown of mercantile ethics, there seem to be damn few customers around. The cafes, the stores, the shopping districts, they’re all hugely devoid of people. The sporting-goods store where Moss shops has a gun clerk and a camping-supply clerk, but no customers. Moss asks the clerk at the clothes store he patronizes (twice) if they get many customers without clothes, but he might as well ask if they get any customers at all.

10. In the book, when Chigurh shoots Moss during the fracas at the Eagle Hotel, Moss is shocked and wounded but still takes the time to stop, examine his wound and say “Damn, what a shot,” a marvelous character moment I am surprised didn’t make it into the movie.

11. It’s worth noting that, for a movie so bleakly, relentlessly violent, the Coens leave out a substantial number of killings that are in the book, a good twenty or thirty by my count. Think of that.

12. I see a thematic link between Moss’s body and the Dude’s car in Lebowski — each gets insulted and damaged repeatedly, in novel ways, until finally both are destroyed.

13. The Coens’ narratives often involve conflicts between talkers and non-talkers. No Country features a narrative between three non-talkers, all kind of challenging each other to a non-talk-off. The one talker, Wells, is insulted by Moss for talking so much even as he’s trying to save Moss’s life. This is, I’m guessing, why Wells has to die.


hit counter html code

« Previous PageNext Page »